Books are already a product of abstraction
If I come up with a good title, I'll change it.
book is already an [abstraction product The output of Homo sapiens, with its limited cognitive abilities, after taking in concrete experience, abstraction it internally, and then reconstructing it. If you put yourself in the shoes of a program that has a memory more plentiful and reliable than the temporary memory of Homo sapiens, you will feel like "don't do preprocessing with a poor memory, but output raw data.
The difference is whether you want the digital camera to compress JPEGs, or whether you want the sensed values from the image sensor to be raw, as they will later be developed by a high-performance computer.
Books written by Homo sapiens for a Homo sapiens audience are like digital cameras with floppy disks as storage.
Discussions of the merits of Scrapbox include opinions such as "Media that cannot be linked to requires explaining the same thing over and over again, making the information less dense. Paper books are "unlinkable media."
The format of "a few hundred pages of paper in bulk" is strongly influenced by the convenience of physical distribution.
On the other hand, you can't apply it without abstraction, what do you do about the problem there?
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/書籍は既に抽象化産物. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.